Governance Analogies from High-Risk Technologies
Heading 1
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
Heading 5
Heading 6
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
- Item 1
- Item 2
- Item 3
Unordered list
- Item A
- Item B
- Item C
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
Solar geoengineering (also known as solar radiation modification or SRM) governance can draw onapproaches and frameworks (or lack thereof) from other emerging, high-risk technologies, and hazardous activities. These analogies provide insights into international oversight, risk mitigation, and transparency mechanisms that could be adapted to SRM governance. Importantly, none of theseanalogies are perfect, and some fields offer learnings on how not to do things.
Key Governance Mechanisms & Tools for SRM
Takeaways for SRM Governance
- Hard law (binding laws, regulations, treaties) can prevent unilateral SRM action but may take years or decades to build and implement.
- Soft law (voluntary codes of conduct, research registries, transparency measures) allows for quicker adoption but lacks enforcement and accountability.
- Hybrid approaches, combining international agreements, transparency, and liability frameworks, may provide the most viable governance structure.
- Public engagement and capacity building are critical, drawing lessons from GMOs and space governance can help ensure legitimacy and trust.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay connected with DSG — get the latest news and insights delivered to your inbox.